most recent 30 from genai.meta.stackexchange.com 2025-08-08T22:22:51Z https://genai.meta.stackexchange.com/feeds/question/189 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/rdf https://genai.meta.stackexchange.com/q/189 2 holydragon https://genai.meta.stackexchange.com/users/28 2025-08-08T02:44:33Z 2025-08-08T21:36:16Z

<p><a href="https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/393127/if-more-users-could-vote-would-they-engage-more-testing-1-reputation-voting-on">There is a post in Meta.SE that is seeking some volunteer sites to test an adjustment of voting privilege.</a> There are a few changes, but the highlights are.</p> <blockquote> <p><strong>What would change for sites participating in this test?</strong></p> <p>There are three main privilege changes happening here as part of our test:</p> <ul> <li>Reputation required to cast upvotes is changing from 15 to 1</li> <li>Reputation required to cast downvotes is changing from 125 to 1 The 1</li> <li>reputation cost to downvote answers will be removed</li> </ul> <p>We will notify logged-in users with &lt;125 rep to let them know that they can vote with a popup.</p> <p>To understand motivations for new downvoters, the first few downvotes from a &lt;125-rep user would require them to explain their downvote - this information will not be posted anywhere, but will instead be collected by our research team and bucketed into categories so that we can better understand reasons people downvote.</p> </blockquote> <p>Since GenAI.SE is already an experiment site, boosting participation and engagement (the goal of this testing) very much aligns with one of our current issues right now.</p> <p>Should we volunteer?</p>

https://genai.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/189/-/190#190 10 Wicket https://genai.meta.stackexchange.com/users/12 2025-08-08T17:13:45Z 2025-08-08T16:39:36Z

<p>The Meta Stack Exchange post clearly states that the CM Team is looking for 2-3 established sites. With due respect, and excuse me if I sound negative, this site is not yet established as it's only two months old.</p> <p>GenAI Stack Exchange is the top site on the list of sites sorted by the Newest, so among the 182 sites, it is the least qualified as established, based on the site age. The below image shows a snapshot of the Technology category, but it's the same for the All category.</p> <p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/FgCrF.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/FgCrF.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p> <p>In my opinion, the number of questions and the average number of questions by day is low. Also, there are other &quot;preferred&quot; attributes, like the volunteer sites being <strong>larger</strong>, and having <strong>community moderators willing to work...</strong>. GenAI SE has no community moderators yet.</p> <p>It's worth mentioning that GenAI has already lowered the reputation required to participate in Meta and that few days a ago it was posted <a href="https://genai.meta.stackexchange.com/q/185/12">Initial Moderator Election: Community Interest Check</a>.</p> <hr /> <p>From <a href="https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/393127/1359324">If more users could vote, would they engage more? Testing 1 reputation voting on some sites</a>, emphasis mine:</p> <blockquote> <h4>What is the test plan?</h4> <p>We want to find <strong>2-3 established sites</strong> that are willing to volunteer for this test. Preferably, these will be <strong>larger sites</strong> that have <strong>moderators</strong> <em>willing to work directly with the members of the Community Enablement team</em>, the team dedicated to this project whose primary responsibility for the past year has been creating and improving moderator and community management tooling.</p> </blockquote>

https://genai.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/189/-/191#191 -3 Nike https://genai.meta.stackexchange.com/users/1466 2025-08-08T17:24:30Z 2025-08-08T19:06:36Z

<p>I agree with the explanation in <a href="https://genai.meta.stackexchange.com/a/190/1466">Wicket's answer</a> that GenAI is not an &quot;established&quot; site, but even otherwise, <em><strong>I do not think that it would be wise for the reputation threshold for voting to be reduced to 1.</strong></em></p> <p>Also if you look at the comments and answers on the Meta post for which you provided a link, it seems that <em><strong>not a single person is in favor of the idea, on any site.</strong></em></p>

百度 技术支持：蜘蛛池 www.kelongchi.com